![dfport.mod simply fortran dfport.mod simply fortran](https://docsplayer.com/docs-images/103/159829468/images/25-0.jpg)
- #Dfport.mod simply fortran archive#
- #Dfport.mod simply fortran software#
- #Dfport.mod simply fortran code#
The cow project was perfectly capable of compiling and linking together cow.f90, m_graze.f90 and m_moo.f90 into an executable. This would normally be solved by adding libraries and library paths to the linker settings except there are no appropriate libraries to link to (this is Fortran, not C.) home/me/workspace/sheep/src/sheep.f90:11: undefined reference to `m_graze_mp_ruminate_' Ifort -L/home/me/workspace/cow/Debug -o "sheep". However the linker dies with something like: Building target: sheep Under Properties:Fortran Build:Settings:Intel Compiler:Preprocessor I can add ~/workspace/cow/Debug (location of the module files) to the list of include directories so the compiler now finds the cow modules and compiles sheep.f90. Under Properties:Project References for sheep, I can select the cow project. If I try to compile the sheep project, I'll get an error like: error #7002: Error in opening the compiled module file. For these reasons, I'd rather leave m_graze in the cow project and compile and link sheep.f90 against it.
#Dfport.mod simply fortran code#
I could just copy m_graze.f90 but that could lead to code getting out of sync and doesn't take into account any dependencies m_graze might have. I want to 'use m_graze, only: ruminate' in sheep.f90 to get access to the ruminate() subroutine. Later, I create ~/workplace/sheep and have src/sheep.f90 as the program and src/m_baa.f90 as the module m_baa. The executable and modules (m_graze.mod and m_moo.mod) are stored in ~/workspace/cow/Debug and object files are stored under ~/workspace/cow/Debug/src This project builds and links properly to create the executable 'cow'. Here's a simple example: In ~/workspace/cow I have a source directory (src) containing cow.f90 (the PROGRAM) and two modules m_graze and m_moo in m_graze.f90 and m_moo.f90, respectively. I am using Eclipse/Photran with the Intel compiler (ifort) on a linux system, but I believe I'm having a bigger conceptual problem with modules than with the specific tools. If you have access to an optimized BLAS library, you are encouraged to link your code with it instead of using the reference BLAS routines included in the TurbSim archive.īonnie is on vacation right now, so you'll have to wait until she returns for a more authoritative answer.I'm having trouble understanding if/how to share code among several Fortran projects without building libraries or duplicating source code. If you want to port TurbSim to another platform or compiler, you may have to make changes in the NWTC Subroutine Library's SysVF.f90 file and possibly the BLAS LSAME() function. The code has been written primarily for the Intel Visual Fortran compiler.
#Dfport.mod simply fortran software#
It can be found under Miscellaneous Software on the NREL web server page at.
![dfport.mod simply fortran dfport.mod simply fortran](https://img.informer.com/pd/nortel-bcm-element-manager-v1-main-window-picture.png)
![dfport.mod simply fortran dfport.mod simply fortran](http://simplyfortran.com/docs/full/windows/options/editor_options_left.png)
You will need to download the NWTC Subroutine Library version 1.01.09,, which TurbSim uses. It also contains the Fortran FFTPACK version 4.1, LAPACK version 3.0, BLAS, , and RanLux routines that TurbSim uses.
#Dfport.mod simply fortran archive#
The archive contains Fortran code specific to TurbSim. You should not need to compile TurbSim unless you want to make changes to the code.